<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Machine.Specifications.AutoMocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/</link>
	<description>&#34;There&#039;s sand in my keyboard&#34; - currently developing software in Dubai</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: testing</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>Spot on with this write-up, I really think this web site needs much more consideration. I’ll most likely be again to learn far more, thanks for that info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on with this write-up, I really think this web site needs much more consideration. I’ll most likely be again to learn far more, thanks for that info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>Hi James.  Thanks for this.  Did you ever get around to extending it to use Moq?

thanks
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James.  Thanks for this.  Did you ever get around to extending it to use Moq?</p>
<p>thanks<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Marksbury</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Marksbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I recently attended NBDN with JP and had a great time.  I&#039;ve slowly been adopting the methodologies and frameworks into my toolset, and it&#039;s great what you&#039;ve done here.  I&#039;ll give it a try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I recently attended NBDN with JP and had a great time.  I&#8217;ve slowly been adopting the methodologies and frameworks into my toolset, and it&#8217;s great what you&#8217;ve done here.  I&#8217;ll give it a try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3545</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3545</guid>
		<description>Hi, my master repository is not in synch as other people beat me to it. If you check out some of the forks on github you&#039;ll see others have rebuilt against latest MSpec, .NET 4 etc. 

http://github.com/jamesbroome/Machine.Specifications.AutoMocking/network/members

I think Howard&#039;s is a good one to try - I think that is built against latest and greatest. 

I will get round to merging those changes back into my repo eventually - I have trouble with github from behind my corporate firewall, which is why there has been such a delay.

Cheers
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my master repository is not in synch as other people beat me to it. If you check out some of the forks on github you&#8217;ll see others have rebuilt against latest MSpec, .NET 4 etc. </p>
<p><a href="http://github.com/jamesbroome/Machine.Specifications.AutoMocking/network/members" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/jamesbroome/Machine.Specifications.AutoMocking/network/members</a></p>
<p>I think Howard&#8217;s is a good one to try &#8211; I think that is built against latest and greatest. </p>
<p>I will get round to merging those changes back into my repo eventually &#8211; I have trouble with github from behind my corporate firewall, which is why there has been such a delay.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raza</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>Raza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>Is this still in synch with the latest version of mspec as when I use it with the latest version of Machine.Specifications.dll which is required by Resharper 5.0 to be able to run the tests, I get errors. Any ideas as to what can be causing that? Resharper 5.0 is not able to recognize the mspec tests for the older version of mspec. I have succesfully used AutoMocking with the older version of mspec and can run tests using Resharper 4.5 without any problems. Thanks for all your efforts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this still in synch with the latest version of mspec as when I use it with the latest version of Machine.Specifications.dll which is required by Resharper 5.0 to be able to run the tests, I get errors. Any ideas as to what can be causing that? Resharper 5.0 is not able to recognize the mspec tests for the older version of mspec. I have succesfully used AutoMocking with the older version of mspec and can run tests using Resharper 4.5 without any problems. Thanks for all your efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartek</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>Great job! I just started playing around with MSpec and it helped me a lot.

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job! I just started playing around with MSpec and it helped me a lot.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSpec AutoMocking &#171; Tell don&#39;t ask</title>
		<link>http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>MSpec AutoMocking &#171; Tell don&#39;t ask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbroo.me/?p=112#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>[...] http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/" rel="nofollow">http://jamesbroo.me/introducing-machinespecificationsautomocking/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

